
Discover technical guides, educational assets, product specifications, software utilities and more with our comprehensive electronics knowledge hub.
Discover technical guides, educational assets, product specifications, software utilities and more with our comprehensive electronics knowledge hub.

Not finding what you need? Our dedicated customer experience and engineering teams are available on demand to help with your electronic needs. We're here to support every step of the way.
For over 40 years, Bailey has been a trusted leader in the manufacturing and distribution of hydraulic and electronic solutions. Dive into our educational content to expand your knowledge and discover how our expertise can support your success.
To the untrained eye, a hydraulic schematic looks like a chaotic jumble of shapes. However, to the engineers and technicians responsible for keeping mobile equipment running, these diagrams are a logical, universal language.
Whether you manage a fleet of construction vehicles or run a repair shop servicing agricultural equipment, the ability to decode hydraulic symbols is a critical operational asset. Understanding the flow of energy within your system allows you to diagnose issues faster, order the correct replacement parts, and minimize costly downtime.
Let us help you peel back the layers of complexity surrounding hydraulic diagrams.
Before diving into specific components, it is helpful to understand the framework that governs these drawings. Hydraulic symbols are not random doodles; they are standardized globally, primarily through ISO 1219-1. This standard ensures that a schematic drawn for an excavator in Germany can be read and understood by a technician in the United States.
This standardization creates a common ground for the industry. It removes language barriers and focuses entirely on function. A symbol does not depict what a component looks like physically; rather, it depicts what the component does. A massive industrial pump and a small mobile pump might look very different on the shelf, but if they perform the same function, their symbol is identical. This abstraction is key to reading diagrams efficiently. Essentially, you are tracing function, not physical geometry.
To read a schematic, you must first recognize the "alphabet" of the language. While there are hundreds of variations, most diagrams are built from a few core categories of symbols.
Rotary devices are almost always represented by circles. The distinction lies in the direction of the energy.

Cylinders are perhaps the most intuitive symbols to read because they visually resemble the physical component. They are depicted as a rectangle (the barrel) with a T-shaped element inside (the piston and rod).
.png)
Valves direct, restrict, or stop the flow of fluid. They are the decision-makers of the circuit.
.png)
Just as roads on a map vary from highways to side streets, the lines in a hydraulic schematic vary to indicate their purpose.
.png)
Reading a full hydraulic diagram is a process of tracing the flow of energy. A helpful strategy is to start at the power source (the pump) and follow the main flow line.
.png)
The true value of reading schematics becomes apparent when equipment fails. Without a diagram, troubleshooting is often a game of guesswork. With a schematic, you can use logic to isolate the issue.
For example, if a cylinder is drifting (moving when it shouldn't), you can look at the schematic to see what is supposed to hold it in place. Is there a check valve? A counterbalance valve? The symbol will tell you exactly where the locking mechanism is located. If the diagram shows a pilot-operated check valve, you know to check that specific component for debris or seal failure, rather than replacing the entire cylinder. This targeted approach saves time and money, getting your fleet back in operation faster.
While standard symbols cover the vast majority of hydraulic systems, the specific needs of modern transportation, construction, and agricultural equipment often require specialized configurations. Off-the-shelf components do not always fit the unique space or performance constraints of a customized machine.
This is where the abstraction of symbols meets the reality of engineering. You might design a circuit on paper using standard ISO symbols, but realizing that circuit might require a custom manifold block to fit a tight chassis, or a bespoke cylinder to handle specific load requirements.
At Bailey International, we bridge the gap between theoretical design and physical application. Our engineering team can look at a schematic, or help you create one, and develop custom hydraulic solutions that integrate seamlessly with your existing operations. Whether you need to combine multiple valve functions into a single, compact manifold or require a cylinder with unique mounting geometry, we ensure the physical product matches the logical intent of your design.

For equipment manufacturers, your machinery is your reputation. Every component you select needs to withstand the rigors of tough environments, from dusty construction sites to high-pressure wash-downs. When it comes to electronic controls, one of the most critical specifications is the Ingress Protection (IP) rating.
What is an IP Rating?
Defined by international standards, such as IEC 60529 and ISO 20653, IP ratings classify the degree of protection an electrical enclosure provides against the intrusion of foreign objects (like dust and debris) and moisture (from drips, sprays, and submersion).
The rating consists of two digits:
Imagine a telehandler operating in a dusty quarry, or a boom lift working through a sudden downpour. If the electronic controls are not properly sealed, dust and moisture can penetrate the housing, leading to:
These failures result in immediate operational downtime, costly field repairs, and damage to your reputation. Choosing a control with a low or unspecified IP rating is a risk that can have significant financial and operational consequences.
At Bailey, we understand that your equipment needs to perform flawlessly in the toughest environments. That’s why our products are designed and rigorously tested to meet some of the highest IP ratings in the industry. This commitment to quality ensures that when you integrate our controls, you are building in reliability from the start.
Let's look at a few examples from our product lineup:
Endurance Series Joystick: IP69K Protection
The Endurance Series is built for the most extreme applications. Its IP69K rating signifies that it is not only completely dust-tight but can also withstand powerful, high-temperature water jets. This makes it ideal for equipment exposed to frequent high-pressure washdown, such as municipal, agricultural, and mobile industrial applications. This level of protection ensures that no matter how harsh the cleaning protocol, the joystick's performance remains uncompromised.
Elevate and Harvest Series Joysticks: IP67 Sealing
Developed for scissor lifts and MEWPs, and agricultural machinery, the Elevate and Harvest Series both feature robust IP67 rated electronics. For an operator in the field, this means a sudden rainstorm or extremely dusty conditions won't lead to equipment failure.
Demand and Precision Series: IP67 Reliability
Similarly, our Demand Series for waste collection vehicles and Precision Series for telehandlers are fully sealed to IP67. These industries demand fade-free performance and intuitive control, day in and day out. The high IP rating ensures that dirt, grime, and moisture associated with these applications do not affect the internal electronics, providing consistent and reliable operation.
Beyond the Rating: A Commitment to Durability
While a high IP rating is a critical benchmark, it is part of a broader commitment to building durable and reliable products. For our Sure Grip Controls products, our designs incorporate:
Don’t let environmental factors dictate your equipment's reliability. Build with confidence by integrating controls engineered to endure.
Explore our full range of high-performance electronic controls and find the right solution for your next project.
.png)
Recognizing the warning signs of hydraulic system failure is the same as protecting your investment, maintaining operational efficiency, and ensuring workplace safety. The cost of emergency repairs, production downtime, and potential safety hazards far exceeds the expense of a system replacement.
Many operators mistakenly treat hydraulic issues as isolated incidents, addressing symptoms rather than underlying systemic problems. This reactive approach often leads to cascading failures, where one compromised component places additional strain on the entire system. Knowing when your hydraulic system has reached the end of its useful life empowers you to make informed decisions about replacement timing and budgeting.
The following warning signs indicate that your hydraulic system may need comprehensive replacement, rather than continued patchwork repairs. Each sign reflects deeper issues that, when combined, paint a clear picture of a system operating beyond its optimal performance parameters.
When hydraulic systems begin to falter, reduced performance typically appears as the first noticeable symptom. This manifests as decreased operating speeds, reduced lifting capacity, or sluggish response times during operation. Your equipment may struggle to complete tasks that were once effortless, requiring multiple attempts or extended cycle times.
Performance degradation occurs gradually, making it easy to overlook until productivity suffers significantly. Operators often compensate by pushing equipment harder or accepting longer completion times, masking the underlying issue. However, this reduction in performance indicates that critical components—pumps, cylinders, and/or valves—are no longer operating within their design specifications.
The impact on productivity extends beyond individual machine performance. When hydraulic systems operate inefficiently, entire workflows slow down, affecting project timelines and operational costs. Equipment that once handled demanding tasks with precision may now require careful operation to avoid stalling or failure mid-cycle.
A well-functioning hydraulic system operates with characteristic sounds—the steady hum of pumps and the controlled movement of actuators. When unusual noises emerge, they serve as audible warnings of internal problems developing within the system.
Whining sounds often indicate pump cavitation, where insufficient hydraulic fluid creates air bubbles that collapse violently within the system. Grinding noises typically signal excessive wear between moving components, suggesting contamination or inadequate lubrication has compromised internal surfaces. Knocking or hammering sounds may indicate pressure spikes or loose components that could lead to catastrophic failure.
These acoustic signatures provide valuable diagnostic information about component condition and system health. Experienced operators learn to distinguish between normal operational sounds and warning signs, but any persistent change in noise levels warrants immediate investigation. Ignoring these auditory warnings often leads to component failure and expensive emergency repairs.
Hydraulic fluid leaks represent both environmental hazards and clear indicators of system compromise. Even small leaks signal that seals, gaskets, or component housings have degraded beyond their design limits. As systems age, multiple leak points often develop simultaneously, creating ongoing maintenance challenges and safety concerns.
Identifying leak sources requires systematic inspection of all hydraulic connections, cylinder seals, pump housings, and valve bodies. External leaks are readily visible, but internal leakage within components can be more challenging to detect. Internal leaks reduce system efficiency and pressure capabilities, while increasing heat generation throughout the system.
The severity of leaks varies from minor seepage to significant fluid loss that affects system performance. However, any persistent leaking indicates that critical sealing components have exceeded their service life. Continued operation with multiple leak points often accelerates system degradation as contamination enters through compromised seals and fluid levels drop below optimal operating parameters.
Hydraulic systems generate heat during normal operation, but excessive temperatures indicate serious underlying problems. Overheating occurs when heat generation exceeds the system's cooling capacity, often resulting from increased internal friction, contaminated fluid, or inadequate heat dissipation.
Temperature monitoring reveals system health trends over time. Gradual temperature increases suggest progressive component wear, while sudden temperature spikes may indicate component failure or system blockages. High temperatures accelerate fluid degradation, reduce seal life, and increase wear rates throughout the system.
Heat exchangers and cooling systems play crucial roles in maintaining optimal operating temperatures. When these components become fouled or fail, the entire hydraulic system suffers. Proper reservoir sizing allows for adequate heat dissipation, but oversized or undersized reservoirs can contribute to temperature management problems.
Hydraulic fluid serves as both the power transmission medium and the primary lubricant for system components. Contaminated fluid loses its protective properties and introduces abrasive particles that accelerate wear throughout the system. Common contaminants include dirt, metal particles, water, and chemical breakdown products from degraded fluid.
Regular fluid analysis provides objective measurement of contamination levels and fluid condition. Clean fluid appears transparent with consistent color, while contaminated fluid may appear cloudy, discolored, or contain visible particles. Water contamination often creates a milky appearance, while metal particles indicate ongoing wear within system components.
Filtration systems remove contaminants during operation, but filters have finite capacity and effectiveness. When contamination levels exceed filtration capabilities, the entire system suffers accelerated wear. Contaminated fluid also reduces system efficiency, requiring higher pressures to achieve the same work output and generating additional heat throughout the system.
Repeated component failures indicate systemic problems that extend beyond individual part replacement. When hydraulic systems require frequent repairs, the underlying causes often involve multiple compromised components, inadequate maintenance, or operation beyond design parameters.
Each breakdown creates additional stress on remaining components, accelerating overall system degradation. Emergency repairs typically focus on immediate functionality rather than long-term reliability, creating cycles of recurring problems. The cumulative cost of frequent repairs, replacement parts, and operational downtime often exceeds the investment required for complete system replacement.
Root cause analysis reveals whether breakdowns stem from normal wear, operational abuse, or design inadequacies. Addressing symptoms without correcting underlying causes perpetuates the breakdown cycle and increases total ownership costs. Frequent failures also indicate that system reliability has dropped below acceptable levels for certain applications.
Inefficient hydraulic systems require more energy to produce the same work output, resulting in higher operating costs and missed sustainability targets. Energy consumption increases occur gradually as components wear and system efficiency degrades over time.
Monitoring energy usage patterns reveals system health trends and identifies when efficiency drops below acceptable levels. Newer hydraulic technologies offer significantly improved energy efficiency compared to older systems, making replacement financially attractive through reduced operating costs.
Component wear, internal leakage, and contaminated fluid all contribute to reduced efficiency. Pumps work harder to maintain system pressure, motors consume more power, and heat generation increases throughout the system. These efficiency losses compound over time, making older systems increasingly expensive to operate.
External inspection reveals obvious signs of system aging and component degradation. Hoses show cracking, bulging, or surface deterioration that indicates approaching failure. Cylinder rods display scoring, pitting, or corrosion that compromises seal effectiveness and allows contamination entry.
Mounting points, brackets, and structural components may show signs of fatigue, loosening, or deformation from repeated stress cycles. Paint deterioration, rust formation, and component discoloration provide visual evidence of environmental exposure and aging processes.
Proactive replacement of worn components prevents catastrophic failures, but extensive wear throughout multiple system elements suggests that comprehensive replacement offers better long-term value. Visual inspection combined with performance monitoring provides a complete picture of system condition and remaining service life.
Technology advancement in hydraulic systems continues at a rapid pace, with modern systems offering improved efficiency, better controls, enhanced safety features, and superior diagnostics capabilities. Older systems may lack these beneficial features, operating with outdated technology that limits performance and increases maintenance requirements.
Modern hydraulic systems incorporate electronic controls, pressure monitoring, temperature management, and diagnostic capabilities that weren't available in earlier generations. These features improve operational efficiency, reduce maintenance costs, and provide early warning of developing problems.
Upgrading to current technology often provides immediate benefits in performance, reliability, and operating costs. While older systems may continue functioning, they cannot match the capabilities and efficiency of modern hydraulic technology. The productivity gains and reduced maintenance requirements of newer systems often justify replacement costs through improved operational economics.
Every hydraulic system has design parameters that specify expected service intervals and total operational life. Operating systems beyond these recommendations increases failure risk and reduces reliability for critical applications.
Manufacturers provide service life guidelines based on testing, field experience, and component capabilities. These recommendations account for normal wear patterns, maintenance intervals, and expected operating conditions. Exceeding service life doesn't guarantee immediate failure but significantly increases the probability of unexpected breakdowns.
Planned replacement based on service life recommendations allows for proper budgeting, scheduling, and system selection. This proactive approach minimizes operational disruptions and ensures optimal system performance throughout the equipment's working life. Running systems beyond recommended service intervals often results in catastrophic failures that require emergency replacement at higher costs.
Making the Right Decision for Your Operation
Learning to recognize these warning signs equips you to make informed decisions about hydraulic system replacement timing and investment. Multiple warning signs appearing simultaneously can indicate that comprehensive system replacement offers better value than continued repairs and component replacement.
Regular system assessment, including performance monitoring, fluid analysis, and visual inspection, provides the data needed for informed replacement decisions. Working with experienced hydraulic system specialists ensures that replacement systems meet current operational requirements while incorporating beneficial technological improvements.
The transition from reactive maintenance to planned replacement strategies reduces total ownership costs, improves operational reliability, and enhances workplace safety. When your hydraulic system displays multiple warning signs, replacement investment pays dividends through improved productivity, reduced downtime, and lower long-term operating costs.

The number one cause of workplace injury is overexertion. This can happen while an employee is lifting, pushing, pulling, holding, carrying or throwing objects. These injuries have proven to be costly to businesses across the country, totaling $13.7 billion dollars over the past several years.
By using ergonomic equipment, employers are not only prioritizing their employees’ comfort and preventing injuries, but they are also increasing efficiency by reducing downtime and keeping operators on the job.
Learn about some of the key considerations and science behind designing a joystick for maximum operator comfort, configurability, and durability:
Anthropometrics, ● Faceplate, ● Right and left handles, ● Configurability, ● Durability, ● Ease-of-use
